UK science needs the EU and the wider world
Last night, the Science Council hosted the first debate between the two official lead campaigns for the EU referendum, on the subject ‘UK Science Doesn’t Need the European Union’. According to the exit poll of attendees, the resounding conclusion was that it does.
- 16% of attendees voted to Leave
- 84% voted to Remain
However both sides agreed that for UK science to flourish we need to be able to collaborate beyond our own borders.
There was heated discussion over whether the UK could still access Horizon 2020 funding from outside the EU, while the lack of detail over what a post-Brexit world might look like for UK science became a point of contention for both sides, and the audience.
Representing Vote Leave was Jamie Martin, Professor Angus Dalgleish and Professor Stephen Bush, all from Scientists for Britain. Their main focus was on comparisons with other countries that seemed to fair perfectly well outside of the EU, such as Tunisia, Israel and the Faroe Islands. To which the Remain side responded, “And that’s the list you want us to be on?”
“The European Union is an analogue organisation failing in a digital world.”
Jamie Martin, Scientists for Britain
On the side of Britain Stronger in Europe was Professor Janet Beer, Vice Chancellor of University of Liverpool, Dr Julian Huppert, former MP for Cambridge and Dr Mike Galsworthy from Scientists for EU. Their argument was that we shouldn’t risk an uncertain future. “Why would you jump out of a plane and then find out if you are going to be given a parachute?” asked Julian Huppert.
“There’s a dangerous assumption that leaving the EU won’t affect UK science.”
Professor Janet Beer, University of Liverpool
Audience questions ranged from issues of transferability of professional qualifications and registration, to the lack of contingency planning for science in the case of a win for Leave.
Answering a question about why science had not been a ‘mainstream’ discussion topic in the debate so far, both panels agreed that it was a concern that it was not more high-profile in the debate. Julian Huppert urged everyone present to make science an issue throughout the campaign. He said, “the onus is on all of us to make the science voice count.”
Emran Mian, Director of the Social Market Foundation, chaired the debate confidently and efficiently, although he declined to say which way he had voted.
The Times Higher Education also provides a summary of the debate.
Read what happened on our Storify feed, and continue the conversation with us at @science_council using the hashtag #EUref.